Today America votes for a President or a "Decider and Chief". Let's hope we have a President for the next four years. God only knows what we will have if Romney were elected. I have been decidedly quite during this campaign cycle. I'm speechless when it comes to understanding Republican voters. I'm saddened by the stupidity of people and the process that has created disgust for a great President. I am disgusted by a man running for President that stands for nothing; no, I mean everything; no, I mean flip a coin. How the hell can any intelligent being vote for such a dolt as Willard Romney? The etch-a-sketch candidate was very well phrased.
Romney; the schoolyard bully that will send our troops to fight his battles. His kids won't be fighting, you can be sure of that. Romney's character can be simply determined by understanding the nature of a man that would hold another human being to the ground and cut off his hair because he saw him as potentially gay. Romney; the candidate that organized counter protests that favored the war in Vietnam but had no intention of entering the military. Romney; the candidate that did not once stand up to the hatred exhibited towards his opponent. On the contrary, Romney endorsed the hatred. Romney encouraged the hatred.
Barack Obama said it best when he told the American people that Romney's foreign policy was from the 80's, his social policies were from the 50's and his economic policies were from the 30's. I could not say it better.
Last night I watched Obama's last campaign speech from Iowa. What a class act - enough said! We will be hearing from Barack Obama for many years following the end of his presidential service in 2016. The world wants a winner and America has been lifted to great heights because of Obama's leadership.
What has also saddened me this election cycle was the passing of a great man that made the election of Barack Obama more likely. That man was George McGovern. George McGovern was a true World War II hero. McGovern was a pilot of a B24 bomber and was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his bravery during war time. McGovern had to crash land his flying fortress aircraft on 3 occasions and each time brought his crew to safety. On one occasion he had to pick out a small island in the middle of the Adriatic sea. He always offered his men the opportunity to bail out but they always trusted him to bring them to safety. McGovern was a man that saw the necessity of war yet hated war. He was a man that was to be trusted while "Tricky Dick" was not.
McGovern once said that it was better to be right than to be elected. I suppose this will provide solace to anyone from the losing side. One thing for sure; McGovern was no loser and he helped establish the politics of the left and gave us the opportunity to elect a person as great as Barack Obama. I am proud to have known George McGovern and I'm proud that I stood by him in 1972 and in 1984 as his Rhode Island campaign manager. You will always be within my thoughts.
In the picture, McGovern and wife Eleanor are standing at the podium in Syracuse New York on October 31, 1972 (not my picture and I apologize for losing the credit). I am standing in the 3rd row waiting to hear his speech. As he begins to talk, the church bells begin to ring and drown out his voice for many minutes (probably a Donald Segretti trick). A little old lady stands behind me and is struggling to see him. I say to her, "please, stand in front of me so you can see better". She accepts and moves to the front for 30 seconds then turns to leave. I say to her, "where are you going?" She says to me, "I just wanted to see him, I didn't want to hear what he has to say." Unfortunately, a lot of America is like this.
tomtoak
Showing posts with label Romney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romney. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Obama - the fiscally responsible president
There has been a lot of coverage lately on the Internet and in the news in general about statistics provided by the Office of Management and Budget, the Congressional Budget Office and Haver Analytics. The data shows clearly that Barack Obama has been a fiscally responsible president. The annualized growth of federal spending has been reduced to just 1.4% during the Obama Administration compared to 8.1% during Bush II's second administration. (click here) .
Needless to say, there has been a lot of push back from conservative bloggers and Republicans in general. We all know that statistics can sometimes play with the truth. If we want to prove something, just turn to statistics. The funny thing here is that this information comes to us from non-partisan sources. In reality, the slow pace of Federal spending is hurting economic recovery. Paul Krugman has been a critic of Obama from time to time because of his fiscal restraint. We all know that Congressional obstruction is behind the slow economy. If you don't know that by now, you live in a bubble!
Barack Obama's plan to increase Federal revenues through a modest tax increase on the wealthiest Americans is a step towards fiscal sustainability. Republicans are blind to the fact that government needs to pay for wars, fix infrastructure, protect our environment and improve the lives of everyone by raising revenue judiciously. Republicans and the wealthiest Americans used to be true patriots. They are not anymore. There seems to be no sense of responsibility to this country when it comes to paying for the freedoms we all enjoy. I guess that includes the freedom to hide your money is Swiss bank accounts and accounts in the Cayman Islands-Mitt Romney.
As for those that feel violated by the facts displayed in this government report, I'm sure you will read your conservative blogs and find lying vindication. I suggest however that you turn to the Politifact analysis of the debate where you will learn that Obama has slowed the growth of Federal spending more than any president in the past 60 years. Politifact rates the Obama spending story as mostly true.
If you want your government to be fiscally responsible, the chart demonstrates the need to elect Democrats.
tomtoak
Needless to say, there has been a lot of push back from conservative bloggers and Republicans in general. We all know that statistics can sometimes play with the truth. If we want to prove something, just turn to statistics. The funny thing here is that this information comes to us from non-partisan sources. In reality, the slow pace of Federal spending is hurting economic recovery. Paul Krugman has been a critic of Obama from time to time because of his fiscal restraint. We all know that Congressional obstruction is behind the slow economy. If you don't know that by now, you live in a bubble!
Barack Obama's plan to increase Federal revenues through a modest tax increase on the wealthiest Americans is a step towards fiscal sustainability. Republicans are blind to the fact that government needs to pay for wars, fix infrastructure, protect our environment and improve the lives of everyone by raising revenue judiciously. Republicans and the wealthiest Americans used to be true patriots. They are not anymore. There seems to be no sense of responsibility to this country when it comes to paying for the freedoms we all enjoy. I guess that includes the freedom to hide your money is Swiss bank accounts and accounts in the Cayman Islands-Mitt Romney.
As for those that feel violated by the facts displayed in this government report, I'm sure you will read your conservative blogs and find lying vindication. I suggest however that you turn to the Politifact analysis of the debate where you will learn that Obama has slowed the growth of Federal spending more than any president in the past 60 years. Politifact rates the Obama spending story as mostly true.
If you want your government to be fiscally responsible, the chart demonstrates the need to elect Democrats.
tomtoak
Labels:
Conservatives,
Democrats,
Economy,
Obama,
Republicans,
Romney,
Taxes
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Does Mitt Romney have any core values?
We all need to be concerned about candidates that don't take the time to get facts right. What happens when the office holder is making decisions on bad information? Need I say Iraq! Take for instance last night's news where Mitt Romney claimed the shooter in Colorado got his weapons illegally. Where is he getting his information from? Maybe Sarah Palin's newspapers - oh; that's right, Sarah doesn't read newspapers.
Stories like this beg the question, does Willard Romney have any core values? We all know that dogs don't like him. I need to ask the following question; Which candidate in America has, during their political career, both supported and opposed abortion, "Don't ask don't tell", assault weapons bans, LGBTQ equality, anti-tax pledges, stem cell research, campaign finance reform, raising the minimum wage, belief in global warming, limiting carbon emissions, Bush tax cuts, pathways to citizenship, capital gains tax, TARP bailouts, automotive company bailouts and the list goes on and on? There is only one candidate to fit this description and that is Mitt Romney.
It seems to me that Mitt just can't settle on a political philosophy and is willing to say just about anything at any time. Above all, our President needs to be a leader. An individual that seems to lack a set of core values should not be seeking the highest office in the land. I respect politicians that can take guidance and change their mind from time to time. This trait is a good thing; however, in Romney's case it is clear that his mind changes with the political wind. Sarah Palin may be out there, but there is no confusion about her political view.
I don't think there is confusion over Barack Obama's political views. While I want him to step up to the plate at times, it is clear that he believes in a prudent approach to governing. Why fight the fight when the votes are missing in Congress?
I measure people by the strength in their beliefs. I like both Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and liberals. I would not have a clue how to carry on a conversation with Mitt Romney and I'm confident that voters are shaking their heads too.
tomtoak
Stories like this beg the question, does Willard Romney have any core values? We all know that dogs don't like him. I need to ask the following question; Which candidate in America has, during their political career, both supported and opposed abortion, "Don't ask don't tell", assault weapons bans, LGBTQ equality, anti-tax pledges, stem cell research, campaign finance reform, raising the minimum wage, belief in global warming, limiting carbon emissions, Bush tax cuts, pathways to citizenship, capital gains tax, TARP bailouts, automotive company bailouts and the list goes on and on? There is only one candidate to fit this description and that is Mitt Romney.
It seems to me that Mitt just can't settle on a political philosophy and is willing to say just about anything at any time. Above all, our President needs to be a leader. An individual that seems to lack a set of core values should not be seeking the highest office in the land. I respect politicians that can take guidance and change their mind from time to time. This trait is a good thing; however, in Romney's case it is clear that his mind changes with the political wind. Sarah Palin may be out there, but there is no confusion about her political view.
I don't think there is confusion over Barack Obama's political views. While I want him to step up to the plate at times, it is clear that he believes in a prudent approach to governing. Why fight the fight when the votes are missing in Congress?
I measure people by the strength in their beliefs. I like both Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and liberals. I would not have a clue how to carry on a conversation with Mitt Romney and I'm confident that voters are shaking their heads too.
tomtoak
Labels:
Conservatives,
Democrats,
Elections,
Republicans,
Romney
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)